OBS News
Google
 

Posts Tagged ‘obs news’

California’s priority wildfire in check for now

Saturday, July 5th, 2008

By Jim Christie

SAN FRANCISCO, July 5 (Reuters) - Firefighters in California have fended off a blaze threatening more than 3,000 homes in and around the coastal town of Goleta and are turning their attention to preventing its spread toward the nearby picturesque city of Santa Barbara, officials said on Saturday.

Fire crews battling the so-called Gap Fire are holding the line against the blaze that on Friday had menaced Goleta, a town of 30,000 roughly 100 miles (160 km) northwest of Los Angeles, said Manuel Madrigal, a spokesman for the federal, state and local fire units on the scene.

“It’s looking really good. The crews are in there cleaning up, mopping up and looking for hot spots,” Madrigal said after a night in which firefighters prevented the blaze from consuming any homes in and around Goleta despite flames pressing against residential lots.

Fire crews, backed by 10 airtankers, will now concentrate on rugged terrain near Goleta to block a potential advance toward Santa Barbara, said Rolf Larsen, another spokesman for the multi-agency effort.

“The priority is to put a lot of resources in and order where there are homes and specifically to the east … where it could move toward Santa Barbara,” Larsen said.

The area’s steep slopes and canyons are filled with dry brush that in some spots has not burned for a half a century.

Officials on Friday declared the Gap Fire the priority blaze in California. The most populous U.S. state has been beset by more than 1,000 wildfires in recent weeks, many sparked by lightning storms. The cause of the Gap Fire has yet to be determined.

Nearly 1,200 firefighters and other personnel have been able to contain roughly a quarter of the Gap Fire, which has burned 8,357 acres (3,382 hectares), and they hope to build on that if so-called “sundowner” winds do not pick up.

The gusts typically begin in the evening hours. They were mild on Friday night, giving firefighters in Goleta an opportunity to hold a defensive line.

“At this point we’re optimistic,” Madrigal said. “But you never know, mother nature could throw something at us.”

Fire crews farther up California’s coast battling the Basin Complex blaze in and around the scenic Big Sur area about 140 miles (225 km) south of San Francisco also were hopeful the weather may help them.

The blaze has consumed 68,712 acres (27,810 hectares) in the remote region since starting on June 21 and it is threatening nearly 1,800 homes. Mandatory evacuations are in effect.

Fire crews have successfully defended the village of Big Sur but have been able to contain only 5 percent of Basin Complex blaze, which has destroyed about 20 homes.

They are working under extremely hard conditions. Roads in the Big Sur region are narrow and the area is mountainous with steep inclines running to the Pacific Ocean. The fire has ample fuel from diseased oak trees, tall grass and dry brush.

Radio communications have been broken up by the mountainous terrain so officials have moved their communications center offshore to a boat.

A cool, moist weather hugged the Big Sur coast line on Saturday morning helping firefighting efforts, but it was expected to burn off and hot weather is forecast for California this coming week.

“We’re hoping the cooling holds on for the day because we’re expecting to get hotter tomorrow,” said Rudy Evenson, a spokesman for fire units working on the Basin complex fire. (Editing by Anthony Boadle)

Bill Clinton Tells Friends Obama Can Kiss His Butt

Monday, June 30th, 2008

As Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were kissing and making up last Friday, Bill Clinton might have had other ideas, according to a report in The (London) Telegraph.

The paper reports that even as the former president and the current presumptive Democratic nominee prepare to meet to make their own amends, Bill Clinton reportedly told close friends Obama can “kiss my ass” to get his support.

The paper cited an anonymous Democratic source who provided the quote. That source also said Clinton is not making the primary effort to bridge the chasm between himself and Obama.

“He’s saying he’s not going to reach out, that Obama has to come to him. One person told me that Bill said Obama would have to quote, ‘kiss my ass,’ close quote, if he wants his support.

“You can’t talk like that about Obama — he’s the nominee of your party, not some house boy you can order around.

“Hillary’s just getting on with it and so should Bill.”

Bill Clinton has more recently cooled his rhetoric toward the de facto party leader, but he has publicly expressed his anger over being painted as a racist and race-baiter while his wife was campaigning against Obama.

In April, Bill Clinton had a fiery exchange with a public radio reporter, who asked him about a controversial statement he made on South Carolina on the day the state held its primary, and whether he regretted comparing Obama’s campaign to Jesse Jackson’s campaigns.

Clinton responded: “No, I think that they played the race card on me, and we now know from memos in the campaign and everything that they planned to do it all along.

“Do I regret saying it? No. Do I regret that it was used that way? I certainly do. But you’ve really got to go some (distance) to portray me as a racist,” Clinton said, adding that he has an office in Harlem, and Jackson told him personally he was not offended.

Following Hillary Clinton’s public display of unity with Obama last week, Bill Clinton and Obama are expected to meet in the coming days.

How can I vote for a candidate who does not care about us?

Friday, May 16th, 2008

Race, sex and age are always issues in every political campaign.

In every political campaign a successful candidate will confront racism, acknowledge economic inequality, and assure voters of all ages that their agendas will be addressed. For the last eight years I have trained thousands of political activists to address race, sex and age in the fight to get political power. Most intelligent people acknowledge that political power is never given - it is only taken.

The Mexican American in today’s society is feared as an illegal alien in his own country. He is not viewed as a contributor but as a tax burden on white and black society, even though he is the one who is a strong part of the backbone of small business in America. He is attacked as the one who is stealing jobs. Mind you the phrase is always about “illegal aliens” but racists rarely are able to distinguish between those who are citizens and those who are not.

The Mexican American is a citizen who is feared by the beltway political bubble because of its inability to pigeonhole this voter into any clear mold.

What I am saying is on the minds of many of my political colleagues who, because they fear political retribution, are afraid to come out and agree. They call me and admit that there is a problem with getting attention paid to the Mexican American voter but ask to keep the conversations private. I, on the other hand, by being elected by the grassroots of the California Democratic party, have a great deal of independence.

One great reality is that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and its Chair have miserably failed the Mexican American voter and have not paid back the loyalty given freely and generously to the Party. CNN on its website states that there are 17 million Spanish surnamed American voters who are eligible to vote in the upcoming election. If one estimates that 66 % of all Spanish surnamed citizens in the United States of America are of Mexican descent, one can approximate that 11 million Mexican American voters exist.

Sadly, Americans do not take democracy seriously. Statistically only half of all eligible Americans are registered to vote, and if the Mexican American holds true to all Americans, only one half of them are registered to vote as well. In addition, between now and the November election, one million Mexican Americans will turn eighteen and no one is talking to them from the Democratic Party! In addition, 300,000 Mexicans will become Mexican Americans during this time. New citizens usually register in the party of the sitting U.S. President, but that is no longer the case today. Over 70% of Mexican Americans are registering either as Independent or as Democrats.

In the last eight years more and more Mexican Americans are registering as Independents. My concern is that the beltway is afraid that Latinos will become politically significant in this election. Is the Democratic Party avoiding outreach efforts targeting Latinos because there is no more room in their political power bubble? I certainly hope that it isn’t because the Party is taking Mexican Americans for granted.

Let us face it Mexican Americans are hated because we executed Texas terrorists at the Alamo. At the time, these Texas terrorists sought to enslave Africans in violation of the legal (Mexican) government’s constitution. We are feared because 80% of us are Catholic and therefore not Christian. (I am a Buddhist part of the 20% who are not Catholic.) Yet, in the so-called Democratic Party “faith based” initiative, not one of the state directors is Mexican American. This effort is aimed at the African American ministers so that they can receive funding to get out the African American vote. I do not have a problem with this method. What I am opposed to is the hypocrisy involved in refusing to earmark dollars raised from the Mexican American donor for registration, education, and a vote by mail campaign in the Mexican American community.

(I refuse to use the word Hispanic it was a term coined by republican president Nixon to make Cubans acceptable to white people.)

Hypocrites in the political bubble in the beltway decry my call for $ 20 million dollars as an earmark for the Mexican American voter. Yet, these same hypocrites earmark hundreds of millions for “faith based” initiatives , earmarks for women’s vote, earmarks for “rock the vote” and other earmarks for special interests. They will say this is necessary to assure that the “base voter” voters.

However, when Mexican American leaders request that funds raised from our own pockets is earmarked for return to assure our participation we are told this is illegal.

For eight years I have asked for a budget and a plan to address the issue. Now I ask that $ 20 million be committed to an effort aimed at the Mexican American voter and I am told no.

So here is the question of the day - how do I vote for a nominee at the convention who will not commit to 11 million Mexican American voters?

I am an elected member of the DNC. I am elected by the grassroots who do the political work every day to fight fascism in whatever form it takes. I will be either be reelected or not in June of this year.

In California, we have real participation by the Mexican American voter, not enough but a lot more that other states. 28 members of our legislature are Spanish surnamed and we have had three Mexican American speakers of the Assembly in the last ten years. We get political power and know how to share it. What is a reality is that we stand a real chance to lose the upcoming national election. Those who refuse to acknowledge the fact that the presumptive nominee Senator Obama is unknown in the Mexican American community will drive those voters elsewhere.

So if the Democratic Party is serious about winning this 2008 election, it will bring in the leadership of our community to establish a real effort with earmarked funds and budget to get voters in Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and south Florida to register as Democrats and vote in the November election. It is time to end the racism aimed by the beltway Democrats at Mexican Americans. It is time to recognize that Mexican Americans are subjected to voting rights violations and violations of their human rights. It is time to welcome them back to the Democratic party of Bobby Kennedy who received 95% of the Mexican American vote.

I am not asking for welfare payments to the Mexican American voter, we can raise the money to get the job done from our own. But I will not donate one dollar to the DNC unless it earmarks money for this effort.

Without the Mexican American voter voting for the Democratic nominee in November, you better get used to the phrase President John McCain.

©Steven J. Ybarra JD is a retired civil rights attorney who operates a consultant company in California. He is a member of the Democratic National Committee and a long time political activist. Contact Steven at: sjybarra@aol.com. This article is copyright by Steven J. Ybarra JD, originally published in www.Hispanicvista.com and Obsnews.com but permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media if this entire credit paragraph is attached.

Gates says big changes in store for Internet in next decade

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

SEOUL, South Korea - Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates said there will be a vast shift in Internet technology over the next decade as he met Tuesday with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak.

“We’re approaching the second decade of (the) digital age,” the software mogul and philanthropist told Lee at the start of their meeting at the presidential Blue House, according to a media pool report.

“The Internet has been operating now for 10 years,” Gates said. “The second 10 years will be very different.”

Microsoft Corp., the South Korean government and South Korean companies are investing $313 million in information technology for vehicles, games and education, according to a Blue House statement.

Microsoft and automakers Hyundai Motor Inc. and Kia Motors Corp. announced earlier Tuesday a deal to use Microsoft’s in-car software, which allows people to control music and telephones with voice commands.

The company has a one-year exclusivity deal on the software with Ford Motor Co. in the U.S., but that expires in November. Fiat also has been selling cars with the software.

“We’re doing some very interesting work on automobile software,” Gates said after having dinner with Lee. “That’s a really wide open area where some very exiting things will come out of.”

Lee, a conservative former construction CEO, swept into office in February with a vow to boost economic growth through deregulation and increasing foreign investment.

In the Blue House statement, Gates was quoted as saying that new deals would boost South Korea’s economic growth by as much as $6.9 billion over the next five years.

Gates, at a later event sponsored by South Korean television network SBS, talked about the future of software and human interaction in the next decade.

“We can expect that the variety and quality of software will accelerate in the years ahead,” the Microsoft co-founder said.

Gates added that “natural interaction” between hardware and software was finally becoming possible, citing as an example speech commands to computers.

“The whole environment will be very, very different,” he said.

Microsoft also said Tuesday that it will invest $280 million to build a research and development center in China’s capital Beijing, and will double the number of its full-time research staff in China to 3,000 in three to five years.

Google Ends Microsofts Yahoo Search

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

Microsoft and Yahoo were pushed to the brink of a multibillion-dollar marriage and then to a sudden breakup this weekend by the same player.

It was Google, in the odd dual role of both unwitting matchmaker and self-interested spoiler.

Google’s phenomenal rise, after all, prodded Microsoft, the dominant technology company for more than two decades, to court Yahoo. And Google’s success also weakened Yahoo enough to give Microsoft the sense that it could buy the company at a good price.

A combined Microsoft-Yahoo would create a powerful competitor, and Google early on indicated that it would fight the merger on antitrust grounds in Washington and Brussels.

But Google played a part in killing the deal, for now at least, by acting more as friend than foe. It offered to let Yahoo use its more sophisticated search advertising technology, which by some estimates would have meant $1 billion in additional cash flow a year for Yahoo. The partnership would also bring Google more revenue.

The prospect of such a partnership emboldened Yahoo’s board to demand more money for the company and eventually caused Microsoft to rethink its strategy.

Steven A. Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive, cited the proposed Google partnership as the main reason for not pursuing a hostile bid and instead walking away on Saturday.

“Such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo undesirable to us,” he wrote Jerry Yang, Yahoo’s chief executive, in a letter, and cited five specific reasons Google would be bad for Yahoo.

Yahoo may well pursue the partnerships with Google, its main rival, to bolster its depressed stock price. Yahoo shares dropped 15 percent, or $4.30 Monday, to $24.37. The two companies refused to comment.

Not surprisingly, analysts are saying the Microsoft-Yahoo story has one clear winner: Google. And its stock price reflected that thinking Monday. More than $4 billion was added to Google’s value as the stock price rose 2.34 percent.

Not yet 10 years old, Google has emerged as a powerhouse that is wielding tremendous power in the world of technology and beyond. It was able to influence a government auction of broadcast spectrum. It nudged several cellphone companies into opening up their networks to the phones of rivals.

Its influence is all the more surprising, because its economic power is still derived largely from a single, seemingly prosaic business: the ability to place interesting text advertisements in front of people when they do searches. Advertisers pay for those ads — sometimes $1 or less — only when users click on them. In a sense, Google has built a highly profitable $16.6 billion empire a dollar at a time.

“They are the company that is going to have more influence and more control over the structure of the world information industry than any other,” said David B. Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School. “The right way to think about Google is they are the next Microsoft.”

The mission set by Google’s two founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, to organize all the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful is every bit as ambitious as Microsoft’s goal, in the early 1980s, to put a PC on every desk and in every home, said Tim O’Reilly, chief executive of O’Reilly Media.

“Microsoft succeeded,” said Mr. O’Reilly, producer of the Web 2.0 Summit, a high-profile industry conference. “Now Google has an incredibly audacious goal. Great companies do come from big ideas and people who are willing to go after really big ideas.”

It is the combination of Google’s economic power and its unbounded ambition that strikes fear in industry leaders in the world of technology, and beyond, in advertising, media and telecommunications. In part that is because Google wields power more subtly, and perhaps more effectively, than other big companies ever have.

For instance, this year Google rattled some of the biggest players in the telecommunications industry. The company played an important role in persuading the Federal Communications Commission to impose “open access” conditions on an auction for a portion of the nation’s airwaves. The conditions require that any network using those airwaves allow any phone and any software to run on it. Such a rule breaks the established business model of the cellphone industry, where carriers have significant control over what phones their customers can use.

Google backed its lobbying for the conditions with the promise to bid at least $4.6 billion, the minimum price set by regulators for the spectrum. Google then bid that amount, not with the intention of winning, but simply to force the open-access conditions. Verizon Wireless ultimately won rights to the spectrum.

“They just wanted to saddle a potential competitor with those obligations,” said Scott Cleland, a telecommunications analyst and frequent Google critic.

Some lawmakers even said Google’s role amounted to “gaming the system.” Google disputes that accusation, saying it risked its own capital in the auction. Both Google and the F.C.C. said the conditions would benefit consumers.

“Google has thought very strategically about having to impact the market without necessarily spending a lot of money,” Mr. Yoffie said. “It pays to be clever.”

He saw the same strategy at work in the Microsoft-Yahoo deal. “They played spoiler by giving the Yahoo board confidence that they had a viable economic solution if they turned down the Microsoft offer,” Mr. Yoffie said.

As Google’s clout grows, the company may encounter the same antitrust scrutiny that hobbled Microsoft. Regulators in the United States and Europe investigated Google’s merger with DoubleClick for nearly a year before approving it. The Justice Department has already begun asking questions about the antitrust implications in the possible partnership between Google and Yahoo. Yet it was little more a year ago that Mr. Ballmer described Google as a one-trick pony in a speech to business school students at Google’s birthplace, Stanford.

That remains largely true today. The search ads, as well as similar text ads that Google places on tens of thousands of partner Web sites, still drive the overwhelming majority of the company’s revenue. But it is a one-trick pony with the speed and surefootedness of Secretariat.

Google’s dominance of the search advertising business is overwhelming. In March, Google accounted for almost 60 percent of all searches in the United States, according to comScore. That was nearly triple Yahoo’s share of 21.3 percent, and more than six times Microsoft’s 9.4 percent share. In some European countries, Google’s dominance is even larger.

The search advertising business has proved so profitable, that it has allowed Google to make large investments in a long string of other businesses. Few of them make much money now, but analysts say that many of them may some day turn into very profitable enterprises.

Google is now the dominant player in online video after its 2006 acquisition of YouTube; it has begun offering, mostly free, a suite of e-mail, word processing, spreadsheet and other programs that compete with two of Microsoft’s cash cows, Office and Exchange; it is building software for mobile phones that later this year may compete with Apple’s iPhone and others; it has begun selling advertisements on television, radio and newspapers; and with its acquisition of DoubleClick this year, it is going after the market for online banners and graphical ads, which is Yahoo’s bread and butter.

Google’s success is not preordained. The company has yet to prove it can make money in any of these markets beyond online text ads. Even in graphical advertisements online — the banners, video ads and social network ads, that marketers use to create brand awareness — Google remains a relatively small player. It is an important market that is expected to some day match the search advertising business in size.

“Search is great, but you can’t advertise Coca-Cola in search,” said Peter Sealey, a former chief marketing officer at the Coca-Cola Company. “Google is going to try to compete there, but they don’t have the same algorithm that they had in search.”

OBSNewsTV.com creates YouTube channel dedicated to helping net surfers and iPhone users read independent news online

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

SACRAMENTO, California – (OBSNews.com)  A startup independent online news company, www.OBSNews.com has created a YouTube.com channel (go to www.OBSNewsTV.com to be directed to the channel) to help promote their brand of independent internet media coverage.  In the grandest traditions of Silicon Valley’s garage start-ups the company was the brainchild of two internet entrepreneurs Manny Fernandez and Patrick McGilvray, J.D. 

The company was created in the Fall of 2007 to help gain media attention for McGilvray’s family’s lawsuit against a large concrete company who had dumped hundreds of tons of concrete rubble and rebar on the family’s land (see www.obsnews.com/hanson.htm).  The site soon mushroomed into a news destination.

Recently the OBSNews team covered the California Democratic Party statewide convention held in San Jose at which the supporters of presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton pled their cases for the cameras with passion.

Multiple offers are being made on foreclosure homes and bank owned homes in Sacramento

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

SACRAMENTO, CA –OBSNews.com- April 8, 2008 - People looking to buy or sell real estate in Sacramento, California and across the nation are looking for deals and banks and other lenders are often the place to look. Bank owned homes, also known as REOs are coming on the market in record numbers and prospective homebuyers are sometimes having to bid higher on properties just to buy a house. This is reminiscent of the housing market in California’s Central Valley years ago.

Real estate investors are buying houses again in the Sacramento Valley because prices have fallen significantly from their peak in 2006. While many prospective homebuyers are having trouble qualifying for loans there is still an increase in home sales in many parts of the region.

“One of the greatest things about our company is that we’re a nationwide network of real estate investors who still say, “we buy houses” but we’re also a resource for home buyers who want great deals on foreclosure houses either from investors directly or from banks,” said Patrick McGilvray, president of Sacramento real estate solutions company, www.TheHomeBuyingCenter.com. Our investors across the nation report that in many areas they feel prices have hit bottom and they are actively buying to hold or to resell to first time homebuyers.

The housing market may, as a whole, have somewhat further to fall in terms of average house prices, but there is considerable good news for buyers who want to find discounted houses to buy for the long term. The key in this market, say real estate experts like McGilvray, is to get prequalified for a loan, preferably a government FHA loan or other type loan that has a fixed interest rate. Once that step has been taken there are plenty of deals for the savvy buyer.

Yahoo Rejects Microsoft Bid Again

Monday, April 7th, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO — Yahoo on Monday reiterated its rejection of a takeover offer from Microsoft, again calling it too low.

The company was responding to a letter from Microsoft that threatened to lower the price of its buyout offer and take it directly to Yahoo shareholders.

Although Microsoft’s offer was initially valued at $31 a share, a drop in the price of Microsoft shares has reduced the offer to just more than $29 a share.

Microsoft’s chief executive, Steven A. Ballmer, raised the pressure on Yahoo’s directors on Saturday in a letter warning that Microsoft would begin a proxy fight seeking to oust them if the two companies did not reach a negotiated deal in the next three weeks.

“Our board’s view of your proposal has not changed,” Yahoo said in letter to Mr. Ballmer, which was signed by the chief executive Jerry Yang and the chairman, Roy J. Bostock. “We continue to believe that your proposal is not in the best interests of Yahoo and our stockholders. Contrary to statements in your letter, stockholders representing a significant portion of our outstanding shares have indicated to us that your proposal substantially undervalues Yahoo. Furthermore, as a result of the decrease in your own stock price, the value of your proposal today is significantly lower than it was when you made your initial proposal.”

The statement added: “We consider your threat to commence an unsolicited offer and proxy contest to displace our independent board members to be counterproductive and inconsistent with your stated objective of a friendly transaction. We are confident that our stockholders understand that our independent board is best positioned to objectively and knowledgeably evaluate our company’s alternatives and to maximize value.”

Senior executives from the companies have met on two occasions since Microsoft made its offer public on Feb. 1, but they have not entered formal negotiations. Yahoo rejected Microsoft’s offer, saying it “substantially undervalues” the company.

“We are open to all alternatives that maximize stockholder value,” Yahoo said in its statement. “To be clear, this includes a transaction with Microsoft if it represents a price that fully recognizes the value of Yahoo on a standalone basis and to Microsoft, is superior to our other alternatives, and provides certainty of value and certainty of closing.”

Yahoo said in its letter Monday that board has asked Microsoft for information on antitrust issues and other matters but complained that Microsoft has failed to respond.

For its part, Microsoft has insisted it sees no reason to raise its bid, because Yahoo, which has discussed alternative deals with other companies, has no competing offers.

“Basically Microsoft infers that Yahoo has no alternative deals in the offing, therefore there is no need to raise its price,” said Michael Klausner, a Stanford Law School professor who specializes in corporate law and governance. “Microsoft still prefers a negotiated deal to a proxy fight.”

Mr. Ballmer’s letter puts pressure on the board to act quickly or face the possibility that they will fail to get the best deal possible for Yahoo shareholders, Mr. Klausner said.

But waging a battle over board seats while offering a lower price for Yahoo could prove to be a gamble for Microsoft. In recent weeks, many large Yahoo shareholders have indicated that they would favor a deal with Microsoft, at a slightly higher price. It is not clear that Yahoo shareholders would be happy with a deal at the current price, let alone at a price that is even lower.

Still, some experts in mergers and acquisitions say that without an alternative, Yahoo shareholders are likely to vote in favor of a Microsoft offer, even if it is lower.

“Although shareholders may not be happy with a move like that, in general they will support a premium bid,” said Morton A. Pierce, who heads the mergers and acquisitions practice at Dewey & LeBoeuf, a law firm in New York.

Still, Mr. Pierce says that Microsoft may still raise its bid. “Generally in situations like these, people will bump their offer to avoid the monetary and social cost of going through a proxy contest,” he said.

In his letter, Mr. Ballmer noted that in the last two months, the stock market had declined and Yahoo’s business appears to have deteriorated. He also said that Yahoo had adopted a plan to retain employees in the event of a merger that would make Microsoft’s acquisition even more costly.

“By any fair measure, the large premium we offered in January is even more significant today,” Mr. Ballmer wrote. “We believe that the majority of your shareholders share this assessment, even after reviewing your public disclosures relating to your future prospects.”

But Yahoo has disputed the notion that its business is deteriorating. In a presentation to investors in mid-March, executives reaffirmed their earlier financial projections for 2008 and put forward bullish growth forecasts for the next three years.

“This plan has received positive feedback from our stockholders, further strengthening the view that Yahoo is worth well more as a standalone company than the value offered in your proposal, and would be even more valuable to Microsoft,” Yahoo said in its statement.

Charlton Heston, Epic Film Star and Voice of N.R.A., Dies at 84

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

Charlton Heston, who appeared in some 100 films in his 60-year acting career but who is remembered chiefly for his monumental, jut-jawed portrayals of Moses, Ben-Hur and Michelangelo, died Saturday night at his home in Beverly Hills, Calif. He was 84.

His death was confirmed by a spokesman for the family, Bill Powers, who did not specify a cause. In August 2002, Mr. Heston announced that he had received a diagnosis of neurological symptoms “consistent with Alzheimer’s disease.”

“I’m neither giving up nor giving in,” he said.

Every actor dreams of a breakthrough role, the part that stamps him in the public memory, and Mr. Heston’s life changed forever when he caught the eye of the director Cecil B. DeMille. DeMille, who was planning his next biblical spectacular, “The Ten Commandments,” looked at the young, physically imposing Mr. Heston and saw his Moses.

When the film was released, in 1956, more than three and a half hours long and the most expensive that De Mille had ever made, Mr. Heston became a marquee name. Whether leading the Israelites through the wilderness, parting the Red Sea or coming down from Mount Sinai with the tablets from God in hand, he was a Moses to remember.

Writing in The New York Times nearly 30 years afterward, when the film was re-released for a brief run, Vincent Canby called it “a gaudy, grandiloquent Hollywood classic” and suggested there was more than a touch of “the rugged American frontiersman of myth” in Mr. Heston’s Moses.

The same quality made Mr. Heston an effective spokesman, off screen, for the causes he believed in. Late in life he became a staunch opponent of gun control. Elected president of the National Rifle Association in 1998, he proved to be a powerful campaigner against what he saw as the government’s attempt to infringe on a constitutional guarantee — the right to bear arms.

In Mr. Heston, the N.R.A. found its embodiment of pioneer values — pride, independence and valor. In a speech at the N.R.A.’s annual convention in 2000, he brought the audience to its feet with a ringing attack on gun-control advocates. Paraphrasing an N.R.A. bumper sticker (“I’ll give you my gun when you take it from my cold, dead hands”), he waved a replica of a colonial musket above his head and shouted defiantly, “From my cold, dead hands!”

Mr. Heston’s screen presence was so commanding that he was never dominated by mammoth sets, spectacular effects or throngs of spear-waving extras. In his films, whether playing Buffalo Bill, an airline pilot, a naval captain or the commander of a spaceship, he essentially projected the same image — muscular, steely-eyed, courageous. If critics used terms like “marble-monumental” or “granitic” to describe his acting style, they just as often praised his forthright, no-nonsense characterizations.

After his success in “The Ten Commandments,” Mr. Heston tried a change of pace. Working for another legendary Hollywood director, Orson Welles, he played a Mexican narcotics investigator in the thriller “Touch of Evil,” in which Welles himself played a murderous sheriff in a border town. Also starring Janet Leigh and Marlene Dietrich, the film, a modest success when it opened in 1958, came to be accepted as a noir classic.

A Biblical Specialty

But the following year Mr. Heston stepped back into the world of the biblical epic, this time for the director William Wyler. The movie was “Ben-Hur.” Cast as a prince in ancient Judea who rebels against the rule of Rome, Mr. Heston again dominated the screen. In the film’s most spectacular sequence, he and his co-star, Stephen Boyd, as his Roman rival, fight a thrilling duel with whips as their horse-drawn chariots career wheel-to-wheel around an arena filled with roaring spectators.

“Ben-Hur” won 11 Academy Awards — a record at the time — including those for best picture, best director and, for Mr. Heston, best actor.

He went on to star opposite Sophia Loren in the 1961 film “El Cid,” battling the Moors in medieval Spain. As a Marine officer at the Forbidden City in 1900, he helped put down the Boxer Rebellion in Nicholas Ray’s 1963 epic “55 Days at Peking.” In “Khartoum” (1966), he played Gen. Charles (Chinese) Gordon, who was killed in a desert uprising, led in the film by Laurence Olivier’s Mahdi. When George Stevens produced and directed “The Greatest Story Ever Told” in 1965, there was Mr. Heston, back in ancient Judea, playing John the Baptist to Max von Sydow’s Jesus.

He portrayed Andrew Jackson twice, in “The President’s Lady” (1953) and “The Buccaneer” (1958). There were westerns (“Major Dundee,” “Will Penny,” “The Mountain Men”), costume dramas (“The Three Musketeers” and its sequel, “The Four Musketeers,” with Mr. Heston as the crafty Cardinal Richelieu in both) and action films aplenty. Whether playing a hard-bitten landowner in an adaptation of James Michener’s novel “The Hawaiians” (1970), or a daring pilot in “Airport 1975,” he could be relied on to give moviegoers their money’s worth.

In 1965 he was cast as Michelangelo in the film version of Irving Stone’s novel “The Agony and the Ecstasy.” Directed by Carol Reed, the film pitted Mr. Heston’s temperamental artist against Rex Harrison’s testy Pope Julius II, who commissioned Michelangelo to create frescoes on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Mr. Heston’s performance took a critical drubbing, but to audiences, the larger-than-life role seemed to be another perfect fit. Mr. Heston once joked: “I have played three presidents, three saints and two geniuses. If that doesn’t create an ego problem, nothing does.”

Foray Into the Future

Mr. Heston was catapulted into the distant future in the 1968 science-fiction film “Planet of the Apes,” in which he played an astronaut marooned on a desolate planet and then enslaved by its rulers, a race of anthropomorphic apes. The film was a hit. He reprised the role two years later in the sequel, “Beneath the Planet of the Apes.”

It was all a long way from Evanston, Ill., where Charlton Carter was born on Oct. 4, 1923, and from the small town of St. Helen, Mich., where his family moved when he was a small boy and where his father ran a lumber mill. He attended a one-room school and learned to fish and hunt and to savor the feeling of being self-reliant in the wild, where his shyness was no handicap.

When his parents divorced in the 1930s and his mother remarried — his stepfather’s surname was Heston — the family moved back to the Chicago suburbs, this time Winnetka. He joined the theater program at his new high school and went on to enroll at Northwestern University on a scholarship. By that time, he was convinced he had found his life’s work.

Mr. Heston also found a fellow drama student, Lydia Clarke, whom he married in 1944, just before he enlisted in the Army Air Forces. He became a radio-gunner and spent three years stationed in the Aleutian Islands. After his discharge, the Hestons moved to New York, failed to find work in the theater and, somewhat disenchanted but still determined, moved to North Carolina, where they spent several seasons working at the Thomas Wolfe memorial theater in Asheville.

When they returned to New York in 1947, Mr. Heston got his first big break, landing the role of Caesar’s lieutenant in a Broadway production of Shakespeare’s “Antony and Cleopatra” staged by Guthrie McClintick and starring Katharine Cornell. The production ran for seven months and proved to be the high point of Mr. Heston’s New York stage career. He appeared in a handful of other plays, most of them dismal failures.

If Broadway had little to offer him, television was another matter. He made frequent appearances in dramatic series like “Robert Montgomery Presents” and “Philco Playhouse.” The door to Hollywood opened when the film producer Hal B. Wallis saw Mr. Heston’s performance as Rochester in a “Studio One” production of “Jane Eyre.” Wallis offered him a contract.

Mr. Heston made his film debut in 1950 in Wallis’s “Dark City,” a low-grade thriller in which he played a small-time gambler. Two years later, he did his first work for DeMille as a hard-driving circus boss in “The Greatest Show on Earth.”

Throughout his career he studied long and hard for his roles. He prepared for the part of Moses by memorizing passages from the Old Testament. When filming began on the sun-baked slopes of Mount Sinai, he suggested to DeMille that he play the role barefoot — a decision that he felt lent an edge of truth to his performance.

Preparing for “The Agony and the Ecstasy,” he read hundreds of Michelangelo’s letters and practiced how to sculpt and paint convincingly. When filming “The Wreck of the Mary Deare” (1959), in which he played the pilot of a salvage boat, he learned deep-water diving. And he mostly rejected stunt doubles. In “Ben-Hur,” he said, he drove his own chariot for “about 80 percent of the race.”

“I worked six weeks learning how to manage the four white horses,” he said. “Nearly pulled my arms right out of their sockets.”

As the years wore on, the leading roles began to go to younger men, and by the 1980s, Mr. Heston’s appearances on screen were less frequent. He turned to stage work again, not on Broadway but in Los Angeles, at the Ahmanson Theater, where he played roles ranging from Macbeth to James Tyrone in “Long Day’s Journey Into Night.” He also returned to television, appearing in 1983 as a paternalistic banker in the mini-series “Chiefs” and as an oil baron in the series “The Colbys.”

Mr. Heston was always able to channel some energies into the public arena. He was an active supporter of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., calling him “a 20th-century Moses for his people,” and participated in the historic march on Washington in 1963.

Inspired by Reagan

He served as president of the Screen Actors Guild from 1966 to 1971, following in the footsteps of his friend and role model Ronald Reagan. A registered Democrat for many years, he was nevertheless selective in the candidates he chose to support and often campaigned for conservatives.

In 1981, President Reagan appointed him co-chairman of the President’s Task Force on the Arts and Humanities, a group formed to devise ways to obtain financing for arts organizations. Although he had reservations about some projects supported by the National Endowment for the Arts, Mr. Heston wound up defending the agency against charges of elitism.

Again and again, he proved himself a cogent and effective speaker, but he rejected suggestions that he run for office. “I’d rather play a senator than be one,” he said.

He became a Republican after Democrats in the Senate blocked the confirmation of Judge Robert Bork, a conservative, to the Supreme Court in 1987. Mr. Heston had supported the nomination and was critical of the Reagan White House for misreading the depth of the liberal opposition.

Mr. Heston frequently spoke out against what he saw as evidence of the decline and debasement of American culture. In 1992, appalled by the lyrics on “Cop Killer,” a recording by the rap artist Ice T, he blasted the album at a Time Warner stockholders meeting and was a force in having it withdrawn from the marketplace.

In the 1996 elections, he campaigned on behalf of some 50 Republican candidates and began to speak out against gun control. In 1997, he was elected vice president of the N.R.A.

In December of that year, as the keynote speaker at the 20th anniversary gala of the Free Congress Foundation, Mr. Heston described “a cultural war” raging across America, “storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe.”

A Relentless Drive

The next year, in his 70’s, he was elected president of the N.R.A. In his speech at the association’s convention before his election, he trained his oratorical artillery on President Bill Clinton: “Mr. Clinton, sir, America didn’t trust you with our health care system. America didn’t trust you with gays in the military. America doesn’t trust you with our 21-year-old daughters, and we sure, Lord, don’t trust you with our guns.”

He was in the news again after the shootings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo., in April 1999, when he said that the N.R.A.’s annual membership meeting, scheduled to be held the following week in Denver, would be scaled back in light of the killings but not canceled.

In a memorable scene from “Bowling for Columbine,” a 2002 documentary about violence in America, the director, Michael Moore, visited Mr. Heston at his home and asked him how he could defend his pro-gun stance. Mr. Heston ended the interview without comment.

In May 2001, he was unanimously re-elected to an unprecedented fourth term by the association’s board of directors. The association had amended its bylaws in 2000 to allow Mr. Heston to serve a third one-year term as president. Two months after his celebrated speech at the 2000 convention, it was disclosed that he had checked himself into an alcohol rehabilitation program.

Mr. Heston was proud of his collection of some 30 guns at his longtime home in the Coldwater Canyon area of Los Angeles, where he and his wife raised their son, Fraser, and daughter, Holly Ann. They all survive him, along with three grandchildren.

Never much for socializing , he spent his days either working, exercising, reading (he was fond of biographies) or sketching. An active diarist, he published several accounts of his career, including “The Actor’s Life: Journals 1956-1976.”

In 2003, Mr. Heston was among the recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom awarded by President Bush. In 1997, he was also a recipient of the annual Kennedy Center honors.

Mr. Heston continued working through the 1990s, acting more frequently on television but also in occasional films. His most recent film appearance found him playing a cameo role, in simian makeup, in Tim Burton’s 2001 remake of “Planet of the Apes.”

He announced in 1999 that he was receiving radiation treatments for prostate cancer, but said he would continue his film work and go on making appearances on behalf of Republicans running for office.

He had always hated the thought of retirement and once explained his relentless drive as an actor. “You never get it right,” he said in a 1986 interview. “Never once was it the way I imagined it lying awake at 4 o’clock in the morning thinking about it the next day.” His goal remained, he said, “to get it right one time.”

www.TheHomeBuyingCenter.com, a We Buy Houses Company Expands Into Nationwide Relocation Company

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

SACRAMENTO, CA - April 12, 2008  - (OBSNEWS) A fast growing online real estate company specializing in buying houses and providing foreclosure houses to first time homebuyers has expanded their services to incorporate a include real estate relocation company aspect to their operations.  Famous for their ‘we buy houses’ slogan, www.TheHomeBuyingCenter.com has expanded their efforts across the United States to provide relocation services to consumers and corporations alike. 

Seeing a great need for people who want to sell or buy real estate and have all aspects of their transition coordinated by one team, TheHomeBuyingCenter.com acted to provide more services than simply buying houses.  In addition to buying houses quickly for cash, the company also has a nationwide network of certified real estate agents who are specially trained in how to sell houses fast in difficult markets and how to buy foreclosure houses for their clients from banks and other lenders who have REO properties for sale.

The company reports that if a home meets the company’s team of investors’ criteria one of the  nationwide investors will buy it from you for a no-hassle quick closing for cash.  In addition a full range of real estate relocation services if offered to help you get top dollar for your house quickly and to buy foreclosure houses at a fraction of the cost of similar homes on the resale market.



© 2007 OBS News An Online News Destination. All Rights Reserved.

Media Requests for Interviews info@obsnews.com   Employment