OBS News
Google
 

Tiger-Attacked Brothers Hire Legal Pit Bull

By MARCUS BARAM

The brothers who survived the vicious tiger attacks at San Francisco Zoo last week have hired legal pit bull Mark Geragos in anticipation of filing a lawsuit against the zoo.

Geragos, who is known for his roster of high-profile clients from Michael Jackson and Winona Ryder to Scott Peterson and Susan McDougal, is already making claims about what he says is the zoo’s “utter disregard for safety.” His new clients, brothers Paul and Kulbir Dhaliwal, were released from San Francisco General Hospital Saturday and are recovering from injuries sustained in the attack that killed their friend, Carlos Sousa Jr.

“There are some very disturbing facts yet to come out about what happened,” Geragos told ABCNews.com. “One of the brothers had absolutely no reason to be attacked. After Carlos was attacked, this brother ran to the zoo café and they would not let him in. The same guys who sold him nachos wouldn’t let him back in. They locked the doors. Thirty minutes later, he was attacked by the tiger.”

An employee barricaded in the zoo’s Terrace Café reportedly made the first 911 calls, saying that one of the brothers was screaming outside. According to police logs obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle, officers were initially skeptical of claims of an attack: “Zoo personnel dispatch now say there are two males whom the zoo thinks are 800 [mentally unstable] and making something up. But one is in fact bleeding from the back of the head.”

According to those logs, firefighters and police officers were forced to wait outside for as long as six minutes by zoo security guards enforcing an emergency lockdown.

Geragos also claims that the zoo’s security staff was missing in action. “Has anybody even talked to this woman who was in the security golf cart? She was motoring around in between the first and second attacks. What was she doing?”

In addition, Geragos cited the recent revelation that Tatiana, the 350-pound Siberian tiger, escaped her enclosure because the 12-foot, 5-inch wall was nearly 4 feet below industry recommendations.

Geragos cited a previous incident in which zookeeper Lori Komejan had the flesh chewed off her arm while she was feeding Tatiana in December 2006 as indicative of the zoo’s negligence. Komejan filed her own suit against the zoo after that incident, and the zoo spent $250,000 on safety upgrades. The zoo is a partnership between the city and the nonprofit San Francisco Zoological Society.

“Clearly, they were on notice after that,” said Geragos. “They were deficient on virtually every level. To say that the zoo was mismanaged is an understatement.”

Geragos said he was with the brothers last night “and they are absolutely devastated by what happened to Carlos. They are grieving like you would not believe.”

The brothers have not spoken publicly about the incident or about reports that they and Carlos may have taunted Tatiana. “We talked about it, and the whole experience was awful, but they’re not ready to say anything publicly yet,” said Geragos. “They’re still grieving, and they’re angry at the zoo.”

The lawyer also claimed that many details have been misreported, saying that reports of the trio taunting the tiger were “an urban legend.”

Those claims were vigorously disputed by Sam Singer, a well-known crisis-management spokesman hired by the zoo. “On the face of it, his claims appear to be false and most are based on misinformation,” he says. “If you take a look at the actual facts, you’ll have a hard time proving them (Geragos’s claims).”

The zoo, which reopens Thursday since closing after the attacks, could also face heavy fines from regulators and even be stripped of its exhibitor license. The U.S. Department of Agriculture sent inspectors and could impose fines on the zoo.

When the zoo reopens, the tigers and other large cats will not be on exhibit in the outdoor enclosures, a zoo spokesman said. The tigers will be moved to another location within the facility where they will have a safe space to exercise.

The zoo could also face criminal charges, based upon the results of a police investigation.

“They’re going to try to determine how the animal got out and whether that violated our regulations,” USDA spokesman Jim Rogers told The Associated Press. “A facility must have a sufficient barrier between the viewing public and the animals.”

Zoo officials or spokespeople could not be reached for comment on New Year’s Day.

Monday, a spokesman announced that the zoo was working with the city’s Recreation & Park Department to design a new security system for the tiger and lion grottos, which should be ready in 30 days. The zoo has also invited the Association of Zoos and Aquariums to tour and inspect its facilities, according to the spokesman.

Tags: , , ,

6 Responses to “Tiger-Attacked Brothers Hire Legal Pit Bull”

  1. SarekTheGreat Says:

    Where is the part where the brothers taunted the tiger ? Human life is precious , but silliness of Youth cannot be discounted either. What is the root cause of this in the first place ? An Agressive tiger, or the silliness of Youth.

  2. Frank Keller Says:

    I just saw a report on the news which said there was no indication of taunting of the animal by these kids, even though 3 slingshots were found in their back pockets.

    Oh please!

    Three kids going to a zoo with slingshots? Um, what were they planning on doing with them?

    And to the mental giant who can’t discern indications from indications, maybe you better get another job, as this isn’t rocket science, nor does it take a Sherlock Holmes to figure this one out.

  3. Johanna Says:

    I do not believe a word these kids say! These kids attacked the tiger 1st by teasing it. The poor tiger did exactly what tigers do. I hope they lose and never get a cent! I hope the zoo sues these two kids for the death of that poor tiger! They started it and that poor tiger finished it. I feels sorry for that zoo and that poor tiger, but these attacking kid!

  4. Hitchwitt Says:

    Only the two Dhaliwal brothers know the full truth of what happened on Christmas Day at the San Francisco Zoo. Unfortunately, now that attorney Mark Geragos has been retained, the truth will be withheld from the public, the media and the courts. The truth might help improve upon zoo design and regulations nationwide — but that is not the motivator for Geragos.

    Mark Geragos appears to represent all that is wrong with our legal system — placing greed and self-interest above truth and justice.

  5. Ken Says:

    Per what I heard on KTLA (morning new in LA) this morning… apparently the two survivors had slingshots on them. Make what you will of that. I’m only surprised CNN and others have not jumped on that news.

  6. Eric Ramey Says:

    Is it true these boys were firing a slingshot at the tiger? If this is so they should lose all legal rights. People that think they can do as they please with no responsibility for what they do need to be removed from society. Common sense should say that if you taunt a tiger and are eaten by that tiger, natural selection has done it’s job. Not that I am a fan of zoos, but how can anyone, including the parents of idiots like that, think that the zoo is at fault. Stupid is as stupid does. The boys were stupid, the tiger attempted to remedy it with natural selection and in the process was killed for following natural law. What needs to be done is the job the tiger began should be finished. Walk into their hospital rooms, put a gun to their heads and treat them like a man-eating tiger. No remorse should be shed for their loss. It should be celebrated.

Leave a Reply



© 2007 OBS News An Online News Destination. All Rights Reserved.

Media Requests for Interviews info@obsnews.com   Employment